Tuesday, 20 November 2012

SAD and the Winter Blues: GP Tips


‘In the dark time of the year…
The soul’s sap quivers.’
 
TS Eliot, ‘Little Gidding’

For many of us, as the dark descends so does our mood. I’ve never understood why ‘SAD’, to some people at least, has been a controversial diagnosis. Compared to a lot of nonsense in the DSM, the diagnosis of SAD as recurrent major depressive episodes with a seasonal pattern’ seems to just to be what it says on the tin.
 
Who gets it?
 
In the UK 6% of adults suffer from SAD but many more, perhaps most of us, get a milder form of ‘winter blues’. It tends to come on in early adulthood, but can occur in children, and women are more often affected.  
 
How does it present?
 
People of course rarely come in and say I have ‘SAD’. But people with SAD consult us much more than matched control groups with non-specific symptoms.  As well as the typical symptoms of depression it presents with atypical (‘hibernation-like’) symptoms such as hyper-somnolence, carbohydrate craving and weight gain.  The symptoms of SAD often resonate with seasonal changes seen elsewhere in the animal world. Top of my list of ‘research papers I never get time to write’ is that it is my impression that ‘tired all the time’ consultations become more frequent once the darkness descends.
 
What causes SAD?
 
Serotonin metabolism has a seasonal pattern and melatonin metabolism is also thought to play a role. Melatonin secretion is stimulated by darkness and suppressed by light. Failure to switch off melatonin, which may have a genetic component, has been implicated as a cause. This may be linked to seasonal changes seen elsewhere in the animal world. Even algae demonstrate seasonal changes in behaviour, and some evolutionary biologists have suggested SAD may be a reflection of an energy-conserving hibernation like state which is adaptive. Some papers have found an association (no surprise) with Vitamin D deficiency, but there is no convincing evidence that Vitamin D supplementation prevents it.
 
How should we diagnose it?
 
As with everything in general practice, awareness and an open mind is key. It is worth asking about seasonal changes in mood and behaviour in people presenting not just with depression but with ‘tired all the time’, hyper-somnolence and ‘I just feel run down doctor’ in the winter months.

 
What treatments are proven to work?
 
There is evidence for antidepressants, light therapy and (of course..) CBT!

  • Light therapy
·         It is thought that morning light therapy might suppress excess melatonin secretion and influence serotonin metabolism.  A systematic review of RCTs of bright light therapy for SAD comparing at least 3,000 lux-hours  daily compared to a control of just 300 lux showed persistently positive outcome for the light therapy
·         This ‘light therapy’ usually consists of no more than sitting 2 or 3 feet away from a bright light ‘box’ on a table, you can read/work at the same time, for 30-60 minutes a day.  A ‘dawn simulator’ light is an alternative strategy.
·         SAD lights cannot be prescribed on the NHS, but if patients have SAD they do not have to pay VAT i.e. a 20% discount.

o   Antidepressants

·         There is a lack of good quality evidence, but there is some RCT evidence for fluoxetine. For selected patients, these may just be taken in autumn and winter (NB anecdotally I have a number of patients who find it very helpful to start them when the clocks go back and then tail off when the clocks spring forward again)
·        For colleagues in the US, there is good evidence for buproprion (Wellbutrin XL) as a preventive strategy

A recent BMJ review of the evidence (below) concluded: ‘Using a light box or dawn simulation appears to be a reasonable first-line approach to relieve mild or moderate depressive symptoms instead of, or as well as, drug therapy and/or CBT. Patients with more severe symptoms should be treated with antidepressant drugs with or without light therapy and/or CBT’
 
Self-help. There is a lack of evidence for exercise, but anecdotally it definitely seems to help!  NHS direct has a useful self-help leaflet for SAD and also for ‘winter blues’ recommending exercise, diet and exposure to natural light (see below)
 
Conclusion
 
Be aware of SAD and Winter Blues in patients presenting not just with low mood, but also ‘tired all the time’, hyper-somnolence and general malaise. For simple ‘Winter Blues’ advise lifestyle changes and consideration of light therapy. For established SAD consider light therapy, seasonal SSRIs and CBT. There is no convincing evidence for Vitamin D, but given there is an association with Vitamin D deficiency supplementation may be worthwhile.

 Simon

Resources for patients:

o   Great book, but quite detailed!


o   Very useful web-pages




o   Information on light therapy


http://www.lumie.com/  (NB this company offer a free 30 day trial; if its going to work it should be by then! No conflict of interest here.)

References:






 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SAD was reviewed in the BMJ 2010:340:c2135

 

 

o   The SAD association www.sada.org.uk has useful information on how to do it, manufacturers and costs of lights etc.)

 

Thursday, 8 November 2012

AAA screening

The new NHS screening programme for AAA is being rolled out. The information for patients and drs states that screening 'could reduce the rate of premature death from ruptured AAA by up to 50%', but it fails to mention what this means in absolute terms. We covered this on the Hot Topics last year, see below. We believe patients and doctors should be aware that this 50% 'relative risk' reduction in absolute terms is from 0.87% to 0.46%, and that despite 67,000 people being included in the original study there was no reduction in overall mortality.


A screening programme for AAA for men aged 65 (www.aaa.screening.nhs.uk) is being introduced gradually across England, it started in 2009 and it is anticipated it will be nationwide by 2013. In Scotland it will be phased in between 20011 and 2013, and details in Wales and NI have yet to be formalised. The programme is based closely on the protocol of the The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (BMJ2009;338:b2307)    
·         67,000 men were recruited from 4 UK centres aged 65-74 and randomised to be invited for screening, or not.
·         Overall, screening halved (RRR of 48%) the risk of AAA related deaths
·         However, the absolute differences are very small
o   155 AAA deaths in the invited group (0.46%) compared with 286 (0.87%) in the control group
·         There was no difference in overall mortality and the mean age of death (75) was the same in the invited and control groups
Should I have the test doc?
The NHS screening programme has produced a leaflet for doctors explaining how the process will work (www.aaa.screening.nhs.uk). We can inform our patients that of every 1,000 men invited:

  • 960 will have a normal scan
  • 35 will have a small aneurysm, which will need regular surveillance and monitoring (including more aggressive CV risk factor reduction and treatment of hypertension)
  • 5 in 1,000 will have a large aneurysm and be offered surgery

 What about women?

The screening programme is looking at asymptomatic men aged 65. Women who are at high risk (e.g. due to family history, or multiple risk factors, or both) may of course be offered a routine scan outside of the screening programme. Men over 65 can self-refer to be screened.

 

AAA Screening: NB Practice Points
·         Screening has started, and men aged over 65 will be invited for a scan
·         The MASS study shows that screening for AAA will halve the risk of a AAA related deaths in men, from approx. 1% to 0.5%.
·         Women at high risk will need to have a scan arranged by you independently; they are not included in the screening programme

 

 

 

Wednesday, 17 October 2012

Mindfulness


Mindfulness & General Practice

‘Just when I seemed to be walled up in a life sentence of chronic pain, someone proposed a bizarre way out: sit still, they said, and breathe.’  
Tim Parks, Teach us to Sit Still

 Is mindfulness the new CBT?

 Ten to fifteen years ago CBT evolved from being a form of psychotherapy little known in mainstream medicine to panacea for all chronic ills. Panacea, of course, was the goddess of universal remedy and, interestingly, was a sister of Hygieia the goddess of cleanliness and sanitation. They knew how to run a health service up on Mount Olympus.

Five years ago, mindfulness started to appear in the UK literature with respect to relapse prevention in depression. Prior to that, it had been pioneered by Jon Kabat-Zinn in Boston, with his Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction Programme (MBSR) at Massachusetts General. But it all seemed, to many doctors at least, slightly ‘kooky’ generating images of kaftans, beards and incense. Now mindfulness seems to be the therapy ‘du jour’, and the new psycho-panacea as its evidence base grows not just for depression and anxiety but also for coping with chronic pain and disease.

 This is perhaps not surprising. I see CBT and mindfulness as complimentary ‘life-skills’, fused together as mindfulness based cognitive therapy (MBCT), from which we can all benefit. We all have repetitive patterns of dysfunctional thinking and behaviours which trap us; learning to recognise and challenge them through CBT can be revelatory and helpful. Likewise, with mindfulness. Our minds are perpetually buzzing with random thoughts; they blind us to the joy of the present, and trigger emotional reactions which make us feel ill. Learning to empty the mind, to meditate and to recognise our random passing thoughts and moods as just ‘clouds that skim across the sky’ dispassionately, and without reacting to them emotionally, is a life skill which will simply make you feel better. It is not our thoughts that make us feel ill or hurt us, but our emotional reaction to them. One fascinating discovery of doing mindfulness is that we are not our thoughts. Descartes was wrong about lots of things, including cogito ergo sum!

As GPs we see so much chronic pain, disease, unexplainable distressing symptoms and unhappiness. Most of the time, of course, people cannot be cured and our raison d’etre is to ease the burden. For patients, the bitter paradox is that the natural human desire to be cured of something from which we can’t (and indeed the cultural expectation to ‘fight it’), only increases our suffering and makes it worse. As we know better than anyone, when patients are understood, cared for and supported into a ‘coping rather than curing’ mind-set, things improve. CBT awareness and mindfulness are the two core, evidence-based skills we can give to patients to help them learn to cope better with the ‘full catastrophe’ of living.  

 What is the evidence that mindfulness-based therapies are effective?

In 2010 the Mental Health Foundation commissioned a report which examined the evidence for the effectiveness of mindfulness based therapies, as well as laying the groundwork for greater access to them throughout the NHS as an evidence-based intervention. You can read it here:


 MBCT has the strongest evidence to support it for mental health problems (recommended by NICE for relapse-prevention in depression since 2009) and MBSR for chronic pain and distress associated with chronic disease. MBSR has been shown to help patients cope with their problems (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15256293).

 As we discussed on our recent Hot Topics course, for chronic pain Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, which incorporates elements of mindfulness, is actually more effective than CBT (http://www.painjournalonline.com/article/S0304-3959(11)00339-3/abstract).

 How can I refer patients for mindfulness?

For patients, and for us, it has never been easier to access mindfulness groups. We can do this  through IAPT programmes, through MIND or private groups (which are often relatively low-cost). Many areas of the country are now providing MBSR and MBCT on the NHS, for example:
http://www.exeter.ac.uk/media/universityofexeter/schoolofpsychology/mooddisordercentre/Mindfulness_GP_QA_web_version_indd.pdf

 
What resources can I recommend to patients?

The evidence of efficacy of mindfulness results from group based interventions, however groups are not for everyone. Anecdotally, I have never been one for groups and I’ve never done a mindfulness course. Ironically, I have a bit of a hang-up about speaking in public…But, reading and learning more about mindfulness using the resources below has helped me enormously to deal with my low moods, migraines and the stress of 2 jobs, 3 children and a ludicrous mortgage! These are useful resources to tap into:

Web-sites    http://www.bemindful.co.uk/  
An excellent resource of courses and on-line materials from the Mental Health Foundation. Includes a ‘surgery toolkit’ to promote mindfulness in your patient population. Great idea for practice development.

 
Books:  There are many, but my favourites are:

·         Mindfulness: a practical guide to finding peace in a frantic world by Mark Williams and Danny Penman. Very readable, practical yet erudite, and with a CD of guided meditations. Highly recommended to all GPs and most of our patients! I think the best mindfulness self-help book for most patients.

·         Quiet the Mind by Matthew Johnstone. Matthew is the author of the quite brilliant picture book about depression, I Had a Black Dog. This is a similar book that teaches us, and patients, that learning to relax takes some work! Excellent for all, but particularly for those not into reading books….He deserves every medal going.

·         Mindfulness for Beginners, by Jon Kabat Zinn. What is says on the tin. Has an e-book version on i-books with integrated guided meditations which is excellent on the i-pad.

·         Full catastrophe living, by Jon Kabat Zinn. This book was based on JKZ’s work on the MBSR programme. It was first given to me by a patient 10 years ago. She said it changed her life; I was sceptical. It is a good read but I think it is too long to be useful as a self-help book for most people. It is worth reading though if only for the opening chapter which describes the patients in your waiting room perfectly!

·         Teach us to Sit Still, Tim Parks. Not a book on mindfulness as such, but a superb account of living with chronic pelvic pain syndrome, the failure of a medical profession driven by interventions and drugs to help and eventual resolution through meditation. It makes us realise how much ‘unexplained’ chronic pain is tied up with stress and muscle tension. It is also a very funny and erudite read, and full of great quotes such as: ‘Every illness is a narrative. What matters is the version you tell yourself.’

 Podcasts



 So, in conclusion….

Learning more about mindfulness, and practising it, over the next year would be an incredibly worthwhile thing to have on your PDP and use of your CPD time and ‘learning credits’. But, much more importantly, it will also help you to help your patients and to look after yourself. Remember the in-flight advice: first put the oxygen mask on yourself before you place it on those you are caring for.

 Simon

If you have come across any more good resources, or have any experience you would like to add, please post them in the comments sections!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Friday, 5 October 2012

Interpreting QCancer scores


QCancer and referral
 
Early diagnosis of cancer is a real Hot Topic, and there has been a huge ammount of interest on our Autumn courses in using the QCancer tools to aid patient assessment. These tools should  obviously only be used to aid (and not supplant) clinical assessment by a patient’s GP, but the most frequently asked question has been: is there a recommended referral threshold for the Qcancer risk tool?

So, we asked Prof. Julia Hippisley-Cox herself and this is her reply:

‘In terms of the threshold, there is no absolute threshold currently – my view is that the tool quantifies risk in a way that helps the GP and patient make an assessment of probabilities. For some people, I risk of 2% will seem high and they will want full investigation. For others they will concentrate on the 98% risk that they don’t have cancer X. The assessment also needs to take account of the risks associated with investigation  - for lung cancer, then the risk of an adverse event to a CXR is pretty low but for other tests [eg endoscopic ultrasound scan of the pancreas] then the discomfort of the procedure and risk of perforation might be higher.

That said, we have looked at risk thresholds in each of the papers and there is a table of sensitivity, specificity etc at different thresholds. I tend to think a threshold of 2% overall is reasonable rule of thumb (NB this is the referral threshold recommended by the National Cancer Action Team when using the RAT tool for colorectal and lung cancer, Simon). I suspect this is something the new NICE guidelines may address more fully. I am going to present to them in December.

We have got a new paper coming out [no publication date yet] which combines all the cancers into one tool and gives a global cancer risk and then apportions the risk of each cancer. I will let you know once this is available. In the meantime, there are some slides in the public section of the download page of www.qresearch.org which will give you an idea.’

 
NB disclaimer: These tools are designed to assess the risk of a patient having an existing, but as yet undiagnosed, cancer. The calculators take account of the patient's age, sex, family history, medical history and symptoms. The tools are intended to be used by doctors in a health care setting.

 Thanks Julia! Simon

 

Saturday, 1 September 2012

Olympics, Exercise and Ankle Injuries



Olympics, Exercise and Ankle Injuries


The excitement and success of the Olympics and Paralympics seems to have had a positive effect on the nation.  Cycling to and from the practice each day I’ve noticed a visible increase in the number of people out exercising.  This can only be a good thing for the health of the nation, but it does come with consequences: people seeing their GPs with musculoskeletal injuries.  

This week I’ve had a run of sprained ankles coming in from people with a variety of shapes, sizes and athletic ability.  I always feel my management of acute injuries is a little basic, despite (or possibly because of) spending almost a year doing T&O jobs as a junior doctor.  It turns out that the ability to consent 90 year old ladies for a hemi-arthroplasty while ignoring all co-morbidities has little relevance to the general practice MSK case mix.  

So, is there more to it than rest, ice, compression and elevation?

With fortuitous timing a leaflet included with this months BJGP from Arthritis Research UK on Sports and Exercise Medicine1 contained an interesting piece on management of acute inversion ankle sprains.

These are the most common ankle injury, resulting in a lateral ligament sprain.  So what do they recommend? 

  •  Initially use the Ottawa rules to decide whether XR is required
a.       The Ottawa rules recommended XR is only necessary if there is any pain in the malleolar zone and either tenderness at the posterior edge or tip of lateral or medial malleolus, base of the 5th metatarsal or navicular or inability to bear weight both immediately on injury and at review.
b.      Anterior malleolus tenderness doesn’t count for the rules – presumably its more likely to be ligament-related pain
c.       The leaflet has a very good diagram of the rules – click here
2.        
  • Advise “PRICED” – like RICE but elongating the acronym to include things you’ll tell the patient to do anyway
a.       Protect – clean any other wounds, splint if broken, etc.
b.      Rest
c.       Ice
d.      Elevation
e.      Drugs – simple analgesia +/- anti-inflammatory
  • Review after 72 hours and re-examine – initially the ankle is usually too painful to manage a meaningful examination
a.       3 key tests here – the latter two assess portions of the lateral ligament
                                                               i.      Assess proprioception – can they stand on one foot? – this can be significantly compromised by an ankle injury and increases the risk of re-injury.
                                                             ii.      Anterior draw test – assesses the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL – see the pic below) – stabilise the leg, put a hand behind the heel and pull forwards – feel for laxity, no ‘end-feel’ implies a grade 3 sprain (complete tear); compare to the uninjured side
                                                            iii.      Talar tilt test – assesses the calcaneofibular ligament (CFL)– stabilise the leg, then invert the hind foot – again, feel for laxity, comparing to the uninjured side
1.       CFL injuries confer a worse outcome (the ATFL always goes first then the CFL so it’s a multiple injury) - the paper suggests that onward referral may be needed if the CFL is damaged.
2.       ATFL damage alone can be managed conservatively.
3.       But reading Clinical Sports Medicine2 (the definitive sports medicine textbook), they cite a 2002 Cochrane review concluding that there was insufficient evidence to recommend surgery over conservative treatment for grade 3 ankle sprains – but conservative Rx here implies management by a sports medicine team.
4.       Early physio may be helpful in more severe injuries.
  •  Rehabilitation – can start at this review – in fact all the stages are likely to overlap
a.       Explain the injury may take 6-12 weeks to heal
b.      Get the patient exercising the ankle
                                                               i.      Encourage range of movement – get them to write the alphabet with their toe
                                                             ii.      Improve eversion strength – using an elastic fitness band looped around a chair leg, evert against resistance – the aim is for low power, high reps – 3 sets of 10 bd
                                                            iii.      Improve proprioception – may be the most important part – initially practice balancing on the affected leg and building up the duration, then try on more unstable surfaces – ideally a wobble board, but a pillow will do
                                                           iv.      Arthritis Research UK has a great patient leaflet so all this – click here
  • Return to sport
a.       Start when the pain has settled, full range of movement, eversion strength is good and proprioception is at least as good as the other leg.  Start easy and build up slowly.
b.      Clinical Sports Medicine highlights the benefits of strapping for any athlete with a significant injury for 6-12 months post-injury.  There are lots of common methods, but the simplest is stirrups – put anchor tape circumferentially around the lower leg then with the foot in a neutral position apply stirrups under the hind foot from medial to lateral until stable.

So, at the very least I have a better idea of what I’m testing, why I’m testing it and which patients are at risk of worse outcomes and may benefit from more intensive treatment.  The Hands On series from Arthritis Research UK is aimed at GPs and well worth a read – click here. 

My appraisal’s looming and I remember part of my PDP being improvement in MSK – I’ll keep looking for primary care management of acute injuries.  Anyone who’s interested in more Facebook or Tweet us and I blog it when I find it.  For all you MSK GPwSI’s out there send us your tips!
Enjoy the weekend, the Paralympics promises masses more of exciting sport and hopefully medals. 

Neal


References:

1.       P Wheeler, et al.  Sport and exercise medicine.  Hands On no. 12, series 6, Arthritis Research UK.
2.       P Brukner, K Khan.  Clinical Sports Medicine, 3rd edition.  Lateral ligament injuries, pages 617-622